Currently
52°
Cloudy

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Calif. Senate fails to break budget deadlock

The California Senate shut down at midnight Tuesday after failing to approve a stopgap plan to stave off the need for IOUs and ease the state's $24.3 billion budget deficit. State Controller John Chiang has said he will have to issue about $3 billion worth of IOUs this month to state contractors, college students and taxpayers owed refunds unless there is a budget-balancing agreement. Counties will not get paid for social programs they administer.

Kings County officials said the state's IOUs will affect the county's health and services areas, specifically the CalWORKS temporary assistance for the indigent, social services administration, mental health and alcohol and other drugs programs.

The estimated impact for behavioral health programs in all counties in July alone is $276 million, said Assistant County Administrative Officer Deb West, citing figures from the California State Association of Counties.

"We do anticipate further deferral in August as well," West said.

County officials have already anticipated two-months deferral of payment from the state for the human services agency, and the county has been ready to cover the cost through its reserves for cash-flow purposes.

The impact for the department is estimated to be $3.5 million for July and August, said Human Services Agency Director Peggy Montgomery.

"It's a big impact," Montgomery said. "It will take all of our reserves. Hopefully we'll get our money back in September. If it goes any further than that, that's a huge concern."

The county administration is still trying to figure out how much the overall impact will be for the county and how long, West said.

"At this point, they are saying July and August, but they are no closer to having this budget resolved. So the concern is how long it will really be. That's the bottom line."

Frustration was palpable, as West pointed out that the state's failure to adopt its budget Tuesday night has already impacted schools with the loss of additional $3 billion. "It's almost beyond comprehension," she said.

California will not run out of cash immediately. While spending obligations will begin outpacing revenue without a balanced budget in place, the IOUs will delay a cash crisis until September. At that point, the state will be in jeopardy of running out of cash unless lawmakers figure out a way to pass a balanced budget.

Hanford City Manager Gary Misenheimer said the city will not be impacted by the IOUs, which only affect money taken directly out of the state general fund.

"The money we get from the county comes from sales tax and gas tax," Misenheimer said. "Neither of those are being affected by the IOU process, just general fund monies, so I don't think our operations are going to be impacted at all."

Hanford California Highway Patrol spokesman Jerry Pierce said Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger could be signing an executive order today which would put state employees, such as his administrative staff, on 15 percent, three-day furloughs.

"We're a small office already and without these people in here taking care of their jobs, we'll have to pull people from their regular duties to fill the gaps," Pierce said. "Potentially, that could lead to less officers out on patrol, but we're going to try not to let that happen."

Pierce said the Hanford CHP received their state check in the mail this month, but it is unclear if they will be getting an IOU for the month of August.

"We've had budget woes before, but nothing quite this serious before," he said.

Frustration over the size of the budget shortfall and the inability to find common ground was evident on the Senate floor in Sacramento late Tuesday.

As midnight approached, Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, accused Republicans of holding the state hostage by not voting to accept the $3.3 billion in immediate savings that would avoid IOUs.

"This is craziness. There's no excuse for it," the Senate leader said.

Voting along party lines, the Senate rejected three bills designed to save $5 billion, including $3.3 billion in education funding cuts that had to be enacted by Tuesday. The new fiscal year started today.

The measures fell two votes short of the two-thirds majorities needed to send them to the governor's desk, but Schwarzenegger said he would not sign any bill short of a complete solution to the deficit.

That stand brought a rebuke from Steinberg, D-Sacramento.

"What an irresponsible position to take when our problems are already as severe as they are," he said in asking his colleagues to support the stopgap bills. "Don't be a party to that."

Failure to approve the cost-saving measures will add to the state's deficit, perhaps by as much as $7 billion, because of the state's complicated school-financing system.

At least two Republican votes were needed to put together the two-thirds majorities required to approve the three bills, which passed the Assembly last week with bipartisan support. The Senate's 25 Democrats supported the bills, but 14 of the 15 Republicans voted no.

Sentinel staff writers Joe Johnson and Eiji Yamashita contributed to this report.

(July 1, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

B. wrote on Jul 1, 2009 1:07 PM:

" Oh well........ you can blame the Democrat`s for the condition of Calif. It`s called OVERSPENDING.

Keep supporting welfare, illegal, and inmate programs with no budget cut`s.....and this is what you end up with. None of the three pay taxes or make a contribution to Ca.

Continous stealing from the state worker`s pay, is not going to solve the budget problem. But it will create bigger problems with the economy. "

the oracle wrote on Jul 1, 2009 3:34 PM:

" Burn baby burn.....Let it implode and start over. It is the ONLY way to stop this madness and reckless spending that will only continue unless we ALL stand firm, both democrats and republicans. You cannot tax your way out of billions of dollars of debt, while you are STILL spending money to save the whales, ET AL.....It has to stop or we are done as a state. AG dying off due to bait fish, man made droughts, when is it enough? "

LuvBugzMom wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:10 AM:

" OVERSPENDING has put us in the position which we are in now. Taking money from the pay or our state workers will put us in an ever worse problem. While still funding Welfare, Section 8, inmate programs etc.,,,,is still showing those who get handouts that its "going to be okay for them".
We the people who work hard for our money are getting the kick in the butt while others just sit around doing nothing. The state needs to cut out the programs that need to be cut and STOP BEING A CUSHION for those that dont do a thing.
Maybe a great place to start cutting money would be healthcare for inmates. They get better healthcare than we do & many of us work & pay for our own healthcare benefits. Than our next move will should be the state programs such as welfare, medicare, section 8...etc...this would be a nice start, Heck who knows maybe we will get somewhere if we start this way. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 3, 2009 11:35 AM:

" Maybe the best thing for Ca. to do is go bankrupt and start over. End all programs and start with allotting the tax monies according to the funds generated. Everything will be on the table. Illegal immigration is the failure of the Federal Government to do their job of securing the border so they should pay for the illegals incarcerated in this state and the costs of educating, feeding,medical, etc. If they don't pay do not send them any of Ca. residents Federal income tax owed the Fed's. Route it through the state and keep it here. Sound far fetched? Secede from the union and it won't be a problem. Of course with SF and LA voting that probably won't happen either. "

americantaxpayer wrote on Jul 3, 2009 3:12 PM:

" Okay it's a given that the State spent way beyond its means, and the taxpayers already had voted no more taxes. Make the cuts, deletions, and reforms. The governor is not without blame in this mess, but he also has limited powers. The majority Dem lawmakers are mostly to blame. For those of you who did not vote this May, your complaints mean nothing. For those of you who did not read and understood what you voted for, you got it! What don't you understand about money? All these feel good items cost money that comes from the taxpayers, whom most don't use the services. The services provided are abused and full of fraud; these need reform. Welfare, foodstamps, Calgrants and Calworks are examples of abuse and fraud. I don't mind paying my taxes like everyone else, but I want to see benefits and accountibility for these services. If you don't believe me about the fraud, talk to a bunch of social workers at these service centers. Ask them how current certain laws forbid them from going after suspects knowing that the are illegals raping our social services. Cut off the illegals and save 4 billion or more! "

just wondering wrote on Jul 3, 2009 10:32 PM:

" I am not qualified to "fix" the problems this state's economy is in, but I have to agree with a few of the other posters. While I sure don't want to see anyone that is hurt or ill denied medical treatment, there are some ways to cut back and still provide adequate health care. How about no elective surgeries for inmates, and if they need glasses, let them have a lovely selection of one style. Another way to cut back on spending might be to notify all medi-cal recipients to go to a walk in clinic or see a regular doctor if they are ill instead of visiting an emergency room for a sore throat. I don't know if contacts or braces are available with medi-cal, but I know plenty of hard working Americans that actually have health insurance but it won't cover those things, so maybe medi-cal recipients and/or inmates should not receive them either. Those are just a few items that would be just a drop in the bucket, but you have to start somewhere. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 5, 2009 9:00 PM:

" A lack of money isn't the problem in Sacramento. It is a lack of leadership. Arnold figures he's done his best because he donates his salary back to the state of California.
But he could simply make a few B movies and donate the money from that and get us out of this hole we are in, then he would be a true action hero.

The legislatures feel they have done their best by supporting special interest. Not because the interest is valid, but because it is an easier way to get money for their campaigns for reelection.

The legislatures don’t want to have to earn your vote. They want to buy your vote. The best way to afford to buy your vote is by accepting money from Special Interest Groups.

Each time a representative is termed out in California the cycle begins anew for the Special Interest & Leadership.

So what we as voters need to do is organize our own Special Interest Group to represent us to our so-called representatives. Between here and Sacramento, we are forgotten. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 5, 2009 9:38 PM:

" To: Bobb wrote on Jul 3, 2009 11:35 AM:

Your idea has credence but the thing is Northern and Southern California would first have to split.

Then you could accomplish what you want with the rest of the state, no problem, no concerns.

Ninety Percent of what is wrong with Central California is the beginning caricature in someone’s head from either Southern/Northern California.

When people from Central California make decisions, it is based upon needs not desires, wishes and dreams.

When people in the north/south make decisions it is on pipe dreams, the pun is intended. Central California could solve its water crisis in a heart beat, by diverting water from the California Aqua Duct.

Then let Southern California scream to the Federal Government because they have insufficient water supply, then the feds might listen?

Wouldn’t that be ironic Southern Californians becoming an endangered species?

Oh and of course we need to send Arnold back to the B Movie House. Sorry Alan G. you lose. "

Paul wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:01 PM:

" Bobb wrote on Jul 3, 2009 11:35 AM:

"Secede from the union and it won't be a problem. Of course with SF and LA voting that probably won't happen either. "

And then what?? Cali is already broke and can't pay for anything.

After the tea party in which he called for seceding, the Texas Gov. didn't stay out in the cold too long. He asked for and got 10 million of the stimilus money to rebuild the Texas Gov. mansion. "Hey, gotta' look and live good."

And to think those of you who are complaining of Arnie once were BEGGING for him to run once Davis was out of the way.

Arnie could've put his terminator foot down a long time ago, but he does it now, what for??? "

Alihandero wrote on Jul 6, 2009 4:15 PM:

" News reports and commentaries today are saying that the U.S. Congressional Democrats and the Obama Administration are scared witless that Americans finally see the largest and most prominent Democratically-controlled state - California - is going bankrupt under liberal spending policies. It can't pay its bills and is sending out IOU's!

Now we know why Obama's plan is to rapidly push massive spending for new social programs as quickly as possible before the American public sees, via the California's liberal spending disaster model, what is in store for the future of this country if Obama gets everything he wants simply due to his personal popularity.

This is our wake up call, fellow Americans! "

Bobb wrote on Jul 6, 2009 4:56 PM:

" I was joking about the seceding, my bad. But it does have some merit in that we could get rid of all Federal Mandates. But with SF and LA in the equation we would be back to the same problems quickly. We could send all of the prisoners here in Ca. to Washington DC. Charter the buses and place guards on them and drive straight through until they hit downtown DC. Open the doors and leave them with the Feds. As far a Ca filing bankruptcy, it may just need to happen. All department budgets then would be set at an amount equal to the staes income. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:09 PM:

" Oops, senior moment. I should have said all prisoners ILLEGALY in this country be deported to DC. After all, it is the responsibility of the Federal Government to secure our borders. If they won't pay for the incarceration of those offenders ship them to Congress. They can have an adopt a prisoner day. It isn't just illegals from Mexico as they are very large numbers from South America, China and many other countries coming here on educational visas, work visas our just on vacation who never leave. We just cannot afford it any longer. "

Paul wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:22 PM:

" Bobb wrote on Jul 6, 2009 4:56 PM:

We could send all of the prisoners here in Ca. to Washington DC. As far a Ca filing bankruptcy, it may just need to happen. All department budgets then would be set at an amount equal to the staes income. "

That would be a good idea but where are we going to get the money to send them, pay the gas and the guards, feed them, pay for hotel rooms, all the way to DC?

If we let the state go bankrupt and shut down all services, then who's going to pick up the trash, tell the police where a crime has occurred, where are the police and firemen going to be?? In the soup lines with the rest of us. That doesn't appeal to me.

What is the answer?? Beats me. I'm not in charge. But I do know that letting the state go bankrupt is not an answer. Neither is blaming the Democrats. All Arnie has done is smile and wave at the cameras. Betcha' he won't run again for any office anytime soon. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:14 PM:

" Paul; Trash, Police, Fire,etc. are all local tax dollars used to pay for these services. Because the State cannot manage their budgets they take away some of local funds that provide these services. I would rather have that money stay here for better service which we locally pay for. It costs about $60,000 a year to incarcerate an inmate, depending on the source, as some have it as high as $100,000, so the savings from sending the illegal inmates to DC would be recovered quickly. We, as a State cannot afford to incarcerate, feed, provide medical services, educate, etc. people illegally in this Country. The Fed's do not reimburse us of all those expenses either. Like you, I am just grappling for answers. "

Skip wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:47 PM:

" Paul, when a certain political party is in control of the State Assembly and the State Senate, they are responsible for the conditions of the state whether it's good or bad. Just ask one of your high school teachers and they will educate you. You might also ask what can a Governor do without that Assembly and Senate. Please report back to us. "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jul 8, 2009 1:19 PM:

" Paul, you say don't blame the Democrats. And I ask you why not? After all isn't the majority of voters in CA Democrats? Aren't they the ones that keep approving crazy things, i.e. High Speed Rail between LA and SF? I know I voted against it, probably like a vast majority of Republicans. But unfortunately our votes were not enough to overcome the Democrats votes. You seem quick to blame Arny for everything, but he only has the right to approve or veto. If the Democratic majority didn't approve of something then it didn't get sent to Arny.

Did Arny make mistakes? Yes he did. Hasn't every elected official? You can't always get everything you want. But how many of his suggestions got shot down by the Democrats? And I am sure the Republicans also boycotted some of his plans. But the voters also let him down, sticking to party lines rather then steppind outside the box.

Can spend billions for a train, but can't inform parents of a minors abortion. "

Too Much wrote on Jul 8, 2009 8:52 PM:

" illgal aliens don't get welfare..citizens do. Don't blame welfare for all the budget problems, what about prisons? Look at the high pay, the high medical care and the education that is provided for criminals that won't get out for 300 yearsj? waste? yes! "

Alan G wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:51 AM:

" Regarding shipping illegal alien prisoners to D.C., even though it was a joke, it would never happen because the prison guard's union would fight it tooth and nail like the last time we tried to ship prisoners out of state. Now we're forced to add more beds or release inmates early. Gee, thanks prison guards union! "

Paul wrote on Jul 9, 2009 1:06 PM:

" Skip wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:47 PM:

" Paul, when a certain political party is in control of the State Assembly and the State Senate, they are responsible for the conditions of the state whether it's good or bad. Just ask one of your high school teachers and they will educate you. Please report back to us. "

You see skippy... and pay attention nhg, the problem here is the VOTERS and not anyone else. the VOTERS put all these people in office and if they do a GOOD job they continue to VOTE for them. If you had been paying attention in you high school gov't class you'd know that, no child left behind.

Now just because YOU disagree with who was VOTED into office or their party, well, too bad. I remember republicans dancing in the streets when Arnie was VOTED in. And where are they now???? Where is Arnie???

This ia America people, the majority rules. Period.

Don't like the way things are going??? Then start organizing yourself and your community and get off your couch and do something important.

Report turned in. Next assignment? "

Paul wrote on Jul 9, 2009 1:31 PM:

" Bobb wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:14 PM:

"so the savings from sending the illegal inmates to DC would be recovered quickly. We, as a State cannot afford to incarcerate, feed, provide medical services, educate, etc. people illegally in this Country.

I'm not the cowboy in charge... but bobb are you saying that ALL od Calis problems are because of the people from different countries here illegally? How simple your solution to the problem is.

In the 60's you had people that were passionate about their causes. Now you have old people who all they do is belly ache and write on their computers. Gee that's going to solve alot of YOUR problems.

I have taken it upon myself to do EVERYDAY what I think is right with my beliefs in America and God. And when I am passionate about an issue, I vote, and if I don't like the result of my vote, I go out into the community and push and talk and if need be organize.

Can you say you've done the same thing?? And "attending" a tea party is not being passionate, that's being part of a herd. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 9, 2009 2:38 PM:

" To: "too much" wrote on Jul 8, 2009 8:52 PM:


Do you have any idea how many illegal aliens fill our jail/prison cells? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 9, 2009 2:42 PM:

" To: NHG who's comments are usually spot on, and I agree with him 99.9% of the time.

"Can spend billions for a train, but can't inform parents of a minors abortion. "

I think this statement would ring with more truth if you were to say "Can spend billions for a train, but whom refuse to inform parents of a minors abortion."

The ability to inform the parents exists, the willingness doesn't. "

Skip wrote on Jul 9, 2009 4:42 PM:

" All the state employees got notice of another 5% cut in their pay today (20% all together), so that has got to give more money for the legislators to spend! "

manuel wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:02 PM:

" Watchdog You keep saying illegal aliens, well what are you, you cant be an indian which I thought was a true american for Alihandero as an ex teacher, has a theory that everyone came from outer space, so welcome to america alien "

Alihandero wrote on Jul 10, 2009 5:15 AM:

" Ah, to Watchdog and those few posting here on-topic with a clear head and sound heart:

We see the cause and have solutions indeed. Tax and spend has its own end points and we are seeing that more and more each day.

Alas, we are run rampant by libs so one must be firm and have patience. For now.

And to those here who would rather sling mud at individuals instead of demonstrating a modicum of sophistication, to them let their credo be:

"Ignoramus et ignorabimus." "

Bobb wrote on Jul 10, 2009 6:38 PM:

" Paul; I am not saying illegal immigration is the cause of all of Ca.'s problems. It is a substantial amount of the problem as more people who were born here or are legal citizens need help because of this economy. There is no ONE SOULUTION to the deficit. Little steps and many of them are going to be needed to get the budget back in balance. The Federal Govt. should be paying Ca. for the incarceration of those here illegally as it is their responsibility to protect the border. The voters are as much to blame as they vote in feel good initiatives not understanding the cost which most are funded from the general fund. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 10, 2009 6:50 PM:

" Paul; continued; I vote every election and study the ballot measures to understand the cost/benefit of each one. Many voters just vote on the 60 second sound bite or for their own personal interest. I do beleive that we should have a 2 year budget and no bills can be introduced until a budget is in place. I have sent my representatives letter and e-mails stating this for several years. Bills should be limited to two per elected official. There is no way we need 2000+ bills introduced each year when most are not even read before our representatives vote on them. I am not one of the BIG SHOTS or "movers and shakers" in any particular party or community so I really don't get a personal reply. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 10, 2009 7:00 PM:

" Paul; continued; I do not endorse any particular party as they are mostly groomed politicians who represent special interests. Their goal is lifetime government work. Just recently in the Bee there was a news brief about a Bay area representative who was ousted in the last election and her role as she was appointed to an air quality board with a salary of over $100 K a year plus benefits. They seem to protect their own, these politicians. Mrs. Flores lost her election bid and is appointed to the High Speed Rail Committee. Bill Jones milked the Government Ethanol System to build Pacific Ethanol, went public with the stock and sold it for millions. Taxpayers, Federal, paid for most of it. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 10, 2009 7:07 PM:

" Paul; continued; As far as someone not a "mover and shaker" running for office it is pretty damn hard. It takes vast amounts of $ and to get that you have to usually prostitute yourself to some special interest or political party. Look what happened to Nicole Parra when she went against the party line for her constituents. Jaun Arambula is getting the same shaft. It happens on both sides.Villines sided with the dem's of the first tax hike this year and he will be losing his office in the next election. To be a politician you are owned by the MASTER. I you are not a celebrity or wealthy you can count sheep. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 11, 2009 2:32 PM:

" To: manuel wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:02 PM:

I come from the planet Comet, it is my job to wipe out and destroy germs, grease and grime throughout the blog circuits I visit. For everyone knows if you don't kill the germs you certainly will receive a virus.

Isn't that correct 'will rogers' where is Professor what's his name? "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:29 AM:

" to Paul, you can't place the blame on all voters, only those that voted for the passage of something. I voted against the high speed train, but a majority of Californians voted for it, therefore a huge expense was created, the exact reason that I voted against it.

As for politicians doing good, therefore re-elected. I think that you need to dig deeper. Too many people thing that it is the other guy that needs to be replaced, not their own, so that is why they keep getting re-elected. If only people would really investigate who they are going to vote for. And anyone that is for term limits has my votes, let us get back to people representing us the voters, and not their own self preservation. "

Paul wrote on Jul 14, 2009 1:57 PM:

" NotHomeGrown wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:29 AM:

" to Paul, you can't place the blame on all voters, only those that voted for the passage of something. I voted against the high speed train, but a majority of Californians voted for it, therefore a huge expense was created, the exact reason that I voted against it.

If only people would really investigate who they are going to vote for. And anyone that is for term limits has my votes,

I'm with you knida'.

Again this is America and the majority rules. And again, you need to be passionate about what you believe is true. If you believe that something is wrong, again, you have to get out and push. That is one thing we learned for the 60's. You have to work within the system. Otherwise, you won't get support. Kinda' like the Tea people. The minute there are pictures of President Obama in Nazi uniforms, to get your point of view across about taxes, I'm outta' there WITH my money. And I believe that stable Americans feel the same way.

Power to the voters. "

Bobb wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:35 PM:

" We already have something better than term limits, it is called a recall. We can vote people out of office during any election or in between. But as others have mentioned here, voters seem to put "our guy" back in power and it is the "other guy" who is the problem. The two major parties have become more like a sporting contest in which "we won- you lose" type of a mentality and many people vote right along their party line for no other reason than because it is expected. The media should give the alternative parties more press as to their platforms. I vote D, R and for some candidates not from either of the BIG TWO. Vote the person not the party. Just my opinion weather it is valid or not. "

Alan G wrote on Jul 15, 2009 10:06 AM:

" Bobb, you make a valid point. The problem with most career politicians is they are Democrats or Republicans first and Americans second. I also vote the candidate and not the party, to do otherwise makes one a sheep. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts