Currently
70°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Hanford mulls council chamber renovation

The Hanford City Council wants to upgrade its own meeting chambers in the near future, but how it wants it improved is still subject to debate. Besides the aesthetic renovations involving reconfiguration of the room and a furniture upgrade, city decision-makers are looking into technological upgrades to allow for video recording of council proceedings so they could be broadcast or posted online as streaming videos.

The idea has been on the table since the forming of the so-called Media Policy Committee two years ago as a way to improve public transparency and encourage public participation. But on Tuesday, the council discussed the specifics for the first time in public since 2007.

The cities of Visalia, Tulare, Bakersfield, Fresno as well as the Tulare County Board of Supervisors already have their meetings available for viewing either live on Comcast or online or as archived videos online. Some members of the Hanford City Council would like to see something similar for the local residents.

But still there is no consensus on how they want to do it or whether they want it.

Councilman Joaquin Gonzales said he wasn't keen on the proposal.

"I don't want the technological upgrade at this time. That's something that can be done down the road," Gonzales said, adding that he would prefer to see the aesthetic upgrade out of the way first before considering the technological upgrade.

But Councilman Dan Chin, who initiated the idea two years ago, still advocated for it, although he stressed the relative importance of making the video available online.

Although its franchise agreement provides the city of Hanford with 60 hours of free broadcasting, there is a drawback, Chin said.

"If you don't subscribe to Comcast, you're not going to get to see it," Chin said. "That is a limited approach. I think the future is the Internet. I think it's already here. If we want to project our meetings so that people can actually see them, the Internet is the way we need to prepare the city for."

Among the issues discussed Tuesday:

l the number of cameras to install inside the chambers.

l video recording of proceedings and broadcasting via Comcast or the city Web site.

l whether to contract with a company, such as Granicus, that specializes in streaming media for governments

l whether to broadcast it live on Cable TV or online or to make only archived videos available online

The city currently has $100,000 in the budget for the chambers renovation project. City public works staff has been directed by the council to study further how other government entities' chambers are set up and report back at a later date.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2429.

(May 21, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Alihandero wrote on May 21, 2009 4:02 PM:

" Families don't gather around the computer monitor to watch internet programs like on the TV, do they?

Besides, for the internet you need a COMCAST cable or AT&T telephone service and modem for dialup or DSL so that makes the cost of watching an internet broadcast just as expensive for the most part, Mr. Chin.

Isn't there a public access channel or band for the new digital broadcasts? We used to have public access UHF channels almost everywhere in the U.S. as I recall. Part of federal licensing and all that. And how about PBS? Worth asking about.

And archived county videos available online makes perfect sense. "

Armonian wrote on May 21, 2009 10:02 PM:

" I don't think this is the time for cities to be expanding. We are all tightening our belt, I think Hanford should too. "

Time 4 Change wrote on May 21, 2009 11:15 PM:

" Stream council meetings on the internet?
Forward thinking, yes.
Out of touch with the public's capability to view, definitely.
Totally out of touch with reality, even more definitely!

C'mon, council...priorities! "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 22, 2009 6:23 PM:

" To; Alihandero wrote on May 21, 2009 4:02 PM:

First off if you look back through the blogs of past I think you will get a differing view of who suggested this Comcast idea?

Secondly, the net is not the place for this broadcast it must go to television. You will miss an entire generation of important voters if you put this on the net. The Senior Citizens, for the most part do not use the net or new technology of today. But put it on television and they will view it, comment about it and participate. After all isn't more participation the goal of doing this in the first place.

Of Course Joaquin Gonzales doesn't want this techology, it would hold them all more accountable and make their obvious biased come to light throughout Hanford.

In a time when the dollars need to be watched, the budget followed the necessary services provided is the exact time this technology should be utilized. Not broadcasting this on television would not allow all the citizens access to and knowledge of what it's City Council is or isn't doing. (Continued) "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 22, 2009 6:30 PM:

" To; Alihandero wrote on May 21, 2009 4:02 PM:

(Continued) I do not go along with using the net because that is too subject to editing and limiting the times it is aired. A prime example of the City Council not utilizing technology is the time frame in which it takes to get Minutes of Council Meetings to its' current city site. These minutes are always up to a month behind with a disclaimer saying it is posted for convenience not required. Since when should it not be required to keep the public informed. Not all of us can accomodate the Meetings on Tuesday Night, thus the reason for this discussion.

It has been reported Council Members swear and disrupt the Meetings, well let the citizens see who those Council Members are and decide if that is what they call active representation? Furthermore, the knowledge this is being recorded may check that behavior on its own. "He who shouts the loudest doesn't always win". "It's always easier to give someone a piece of your mind, than a piece of your compassionate heart".

I say Comcast, now! "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 23, 2009 9:00 AM:

" Why do I get the idea this is gonna be another case where the City Council determines for all the citizens in Hanford what is best for them? Why do I get the idea that transparency isn't the goal but a fake demonstration to provide same, instead. Opening up the chambers but contolling how far and wide they are opened. There is a list of cities as long as your arm in the same socioeconomic region we currently reside who"ve had televised City Council Meetings for years now, the list is provided above.

Do not be horn swaggled into accepting anything less than full disclosure in this cities business, now tomorrow and in the future. When you witness those not qualified to serve being promoted beyond their capabilities it will glare into that screen like a bald man's head, screaming I'm not qualified all over it.

When deals are cut and prices are raised for services, it will be known then and there not weeks/even days down the road. When "cronyism" is in full swing it will be clear to the voting public as is to those cutting the backroom deals. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 23, 2009 11:18 AM:

" Well after reading the letter's to the editor portion of this mornings paper. I am so saddened that what seem to be intelligent, articulate people don't get why the City Council Meetings could and should be telecast.

You may feel free to view them, but the primary purpose is to include those in this community that for physical, medical or whatever reason in the process of the cities business. Just because a person can't make it to every Tuesday Night City Council Meeting doesn't mean they don't have a vested interest in what goes on there. Be it for scheduling conflicts, health reasons or whatever, a persons mind functions long after their body is capable of doing so. Just because a person isn't as spry in the legs and ankles as they use to be doesn't mean the gears of the mind quit turning. Those shut ins need to feel included, they need to be connected to where their fixed income tax dollars are being spent. They have vested far too much in the past to get Hanford where it is, for them to just be ignored and forgotten. "Get it Now" "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 23, 2009 11:27 AM:

" To eliminate the seniors from participating even as an observer at home watching television is a dis-service to an entire generation of people who gave their all for this very community.

People should be informed when voting and making decisions that effect all of us, this is also true of the elderly, shut in types who cannot make the trip to the City Council Chambers. If you want responsible voting you must include responsible and current information to make and base those decisions on.

There is more knowledge simply by merely living life packed into these, people than perhaps all the talent assembled on the Council itself. I've always said; we place way to little emphasis on what our elders could teach us.

The only race practicing recognition of elders today is the Indian communities. Where elders are held in high esteem, for their vast knowledge, contributions and place in the tribe. Perhaps we could learn something from them, afterall they are the one's with all the money and the casino's now, not the conquering white man who only offered them lopsided treaty's.

Is a transparent meeting a bad thing? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on May 23, 2009 10:24 PM:

" Rereading my posts, I realized this is much simpler than it seems to be. Why would you eliminate the people who were primary in your life, one's who baby sat you, catered to your every need as an infant and as a young adult? Those whom you valued the opinion of now become couch potato's locked away behind curtains and ignored for their sunset years.

Then a certain group who think of only theirselves and the added cost to include these people and reject it as useless nonsense. What if while watching you they made the same decision and you were injured? They didn't turn their backs on you, so why should you do so now. What if when they feasted at the dinner table you were left to starve and go unnourished?

What many of us don't realize today is everything an older person can do to stay actively engaged mentally and to make decisions, is the best mental health available today. Just because there is frost on the tee tops, doesn't mean there isn't still a roaring fire in the fireplace. Penalize those,most responsible for your successes? "

boyce wrote on May 24, 2009 8:49 PM:

" When councilman Dan Chin stresses the importance of having the video available on line, I wonder if he thinks the City of Hanford's homepage would be a good place to show it?

"The future is the internet" he says. Have you ever been to the City of Hanford Homepage? It's a disgrace. A few working links, unopenable PDF files. Blank boxes with little red X's in the corner. Whoever is in charge of the website oughta be fired.

I went through about 20 (small) US cities at random, all had working websites/hompages. Places like North Pole Alaska, Artesia New Mexico, Hesperia California, Zwolle Louisanna, Emmetsburg Iowa, etc.

Someone is letting Hanford down (badly) Perhaps putting the horse before the cart instead of the other way around might be a good idea. Fixing the current website ought to be the priority, Afterall as Mr Chin so rightly says "the Internet is the way we need to prepare the city for." You are about 8 years behind everyone else. "

Alihandero wrote on May 28, 2009 3:33 PM:

" You nailed it, "boyce!"

Even Wasilla, Alaska has a really great, and beautiful website at http://www.cityofwasilla.com.

This could be a great almost no-cost high school project and contest.

(But this time give a valuable prize to the winner instead of a trophy, please) "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



      PHOTO GALLERIES

      "More Photos

      Sentinel Photos (195) Albums

      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (5) Photos
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (8) Photos
      Arbor Day
      Arbor Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (6) Photos

      Reader Submitted (7) Albums

      Vintage Hanford
      Vintage Hanford
      Monday, December, 15 2008
      (1) Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (43) Photos
      Events
      Events
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (38) Photos

      More



      EMAIL UPDATES

      Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
      E-Mail:
      Daily News Updates
      Breaking News Alerts