Currently
48°
Cloudy

Advertisement





Opinion

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



So She Thought: At last -- a reprieve from 'election insanity'

A new day broke for me, both literally and figuratively this morning, when I sat up in bed and realized another election season has come and gone. Yes, the hoopla is finally over, and we can now safely move on from the business of sample ballots and straw polls to the even more daunting tasks of fighting holiday shoppers at the mall and arguing about the outcome of the elections with our idiot relatives over Thanksgiving dinner.

But no matter what, there are a lot of reasons to be thankful these latest elections are over, even if you are one of those folks for whom things did not turn out the way you hoped they would.

It's my hope, and maybe yours too, that those in charge of political campaigns take a serious look at how things went this election year, as there is a lot to learn about what does and does not sway the modern voting populace in today's elections.

First, I hope they realize that when my phone rings and it's a "robo-call" on the other end of the line -- a recorded message which distracts my attention while I'm trying to cook dinner, fold laundry, or stop the cat from vomiting a hairball on the sofa, that it does not favorably dispose me to whichever candidate or proposition that call represents.

At my house, we are Real Americans, which means family time is all about dinner, laundry and cat vomit. If you want to call me during that time and chat about something, take a number and wait your turn, just like my kids do. Or come over and help me clean the ball of brown slime and coagulated cat hair off the sofa cushions. That would give us plenty of time to talk.

The campaign people should also know that I no longer need to receive daily mailers telling me to elect Fran Florez. This is for two reasons: First, because the election is over, and second, because I'm sure the northwestern United States has already been deforested in her effort to stay in daily postal contact with me.

Any more fliers and I may be forced to take out a restraining order, Mrs. Florez. Stop the insanity. Move on with your life and forget about me. It would be better for both of us.

Another major annoyance in this election was the endless, endless campaign ads which graced the airwaves, day and night. Very few of these ads were about the virtues of their particular candidate or position. They all seemed to start out the same way -- with suspenseful, "Lost"-type music, and just as you thought Jack, Kate and Sawyer were about to burst out from the underbrush, you were instead told that if you voted for a particular candidate or proposition, terrible things would ensue, and that the island -- oops, I mean the state of California, would never be the same.

Which brings me to my last beef of this election season: I truly hope that election campaign planners take note and realize that fear and rumor -- mongering no longer work as valid campaign tactics. Don't tell me why I shouldn't vote for your rival or particular position -- tell me why I should vote for you and yours. Don't warn me of the dire consequences if I support Proposition Whatever; instead, tell me why the position you've taken in regards to it would be better for our county, state or country.

If this campaign has taught us anything, it's that fear doesn't work. Over the past year, for instance, I received various unsolicited e-mails warning me to vote against Barack Obama because 1) his middle name is "Hussein," 2), He is a secret Muslim, 3) He was not born in this country, and lacks a valid birth certificate, 4) He is the BFF of domestic terrorists, 5) he is a secret Arab, 6) he wears dresses on Thursdays and asks his staff to call him "Susan." (OK, I made up that last one, but you get the point.)

While none of the e-mails were officially sanctioned by the McCain campaign, they seemed to be widely circulated by McCain supporters. And although I know a couple of people who actually believed what was contained in those dreadful cyber-missiles of gossip and hate, they were few and far between. Most of us voted the issues, voted our conscience, and stuck to the facts which we thought mattered, and which we knew to be true. And we have a new president to prove it.

In short, I think the campaign managers, spin doctors and PAC folks involved in these campaigns need to realize the average American voters' intelligence has been seriously underestimated by the official and not-so-official organizers of both parties.

Those of you in charge of political ad campaigns need to realize it's not the robo-calls, the flyers, TV ads or anonymous e-mails which make your campaigns successes or failures.

It's the issues, stupid.

Diane Sayre is a freelance writer living in Hanford. Her column appears weekly in the Sentinel. Readers can write to her at The Hanford Sentinel, P.O. Box 9, Hanford, CA 93232.(Nov. 10, 2008)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

ronk6ur wrote on Nov 10, 2008 8:10 PM:

" The most worrysome thing about elections is
that we do not really know the hidden agendas
of all these politicians. "

Alihandero wrote on Nov 11, 2008 6:49 PM:

" WOW,

Ms. Sayre says this:

"Over the past year, for instance, I received various unsolicited e-mails warning me to vote against Barack Obama . . . While none of the e-mails were officially sanctioned by the McCain campaign, they seemed to be widely circulated by McCain supporters."

and then this

"...anonymous e-mails which make your campaigns successes or failures."

So how does Ms. Sayre know for a fact that there - and I use her own words - "anonymous" emails came from McCain supporters?

If they were against Obama, how exactly does it follow that these emails from UNKNOWN sources were, in fact, FOR McCain?

Couldn't they have been for ANYONE ELSE EXCEPT Obama, like Barr or Nader or the Green Party candidate?

Sounds like someone's political bias is showing, eh? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:13 AM:

" Because Obama told her so, and if Obama says it People meet at a rally at the local football/baseball stadium and discuss it on National TV for thirty minutes at a cost of three million dollars, that's how she knew.

If this authors opinions were anymore slanted the Hanford Sentinel would be delivered folded in the shape of a triangle. All points pointing back at Ms Sayer. If you get my enuendo? "

Sid wrote on Nov 20, 2008 2:05 PM:

" Now hold on a sec...Ms. Sayre is sort of an exception: She may have been an Obama supporter but she didn't vote the party line as evidenced by her bashing of Fran Florez (who is so easy to bash!) For Ms. Sayre, it could be the issues.

But, have you seen the latest poll of Obama voters taken on election day? They didn't know which party was in power in Congress or got it wrong, don't know who Pelosi or Reid are and other GENERAL political/government awareness items.

Buth they knew all about Sara Palin's pregnant daughter, her wardrobe, etc.!

Point: The media bias and saturation of negativity against republicans/McCain & Palin worked upon those who don't pay much attention to real events who voted for Obama.

Sure, you might find some similar "dense" republicans/right wingers, but I really doubt the scales tilt evenly there verses their democrat/left counterparts. Again, mostly due to the media's counntless "commercial-like" saturation and sound-bite like approach to "reporting" politics. Obama-Good.,Republicans/McCain-Bad.

And the left is the side touting the "Fairness Doctrine" to be applied to the media! A place that is already unfairly balanced to the left by far! "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts